Patent Bar Practice Exam 2025 – All-in-One Resource to Master Your Certification!

The choice that states the examiner may communicate with the protestor during prosecution is the incorrect statement in the context of USPTO practice and procedure.

In the USPTO framework, once a protest is filed, the examiner does not engage directly with the protestor. The protest is considered as part of the formal examination process, and while it may influence the outcome of the examination, the communication is primarily between the examiner and the applicant or their representative. The protestor’s comments are typically reviewed as part of the record, but they do not have the opportunity for direct interaction with the examiner regarding the protest.

In contrast, a protest can indeed be filed on behalf of an unnamed principal, which allows third parties to raise concerns without revealing their identity. Additionally, protests may include information indicating violations of disclosure duties, and it's required that a protest includes copies of all documents relied upon to substantiate claims. All these practices are established procedures within the USPTO to ensure transparency and thoroughness in the examination of applications while safeguarding proper processes.